If you run a digital agency, you’ve probably had this conversation with yourself at 2 AM: “We need more WordPress development capacity. Should we hire someone full-time, work with freelancers, or find another solution?”

I’ve been on both sides of this equation. I’ve hired developers. I’ve been the developer being hired. And I’ve watched countless agencies make expensive mistakes because they only looked at salary numbers and completely missed the real costs.

Here’s what nobody tells you about the true economics of hiring WordPress developers.

The Salary Is Just the Beginning

Let’s say you’re a 5-10 person agency in the US, and you need a solid mid-level WordPress developer. You check Indeed, see the average salary is around $75,000-$85,000, and think, “Okay, we can budget for that.”

But that’s like looking at the sticker price of a car and forgetting about insurance, maintenance, and gas.

Here’s what actually happens:

Base Salary: $80,000/year
Payroll Taxes (7.65%): $6,120
Benefits (Health, Dental, 401k – conservative 20%): $16,000
Recruiting Costs: $5,000-$15,000 (recruiters, job boards, interview time)
Onboarding Time: 2-3 months at reduced productivity
Software & Tools: $2,000-$3,000/year (licenses for your stack)
Training & Professional Development: $2,000-$5,000/year
Office Space (if applicable): $3,000-$12,000/year

Real First-Year Cost: $115,000-$140,000

And that’s before they write a single line of code that generates revenue.

The Hidden Productivity Tax

But here’s where it gets interesting. That $80,000 developer isn’t producing $80,000 worth of billable work.

Most agencies operate on 60-70% utilization rates for developers. That means out of a 40-hour work week, only 24-28 hours are actually billable to clients. The rest is eaten up by:

• Internal meetings
• Administrative tasks
• Downtime between projects
• Sick days and PTO (average 15-20 days/year)
• Training and skill development
• Client communication and scope discussions

So your $80,000 developer is really delivering about $48,000-$56,000 in billable capacity.

Now do that math again: You’re paying $115,000+ for $50,000 in billable output.

The economics only work if you have consistent, year-round project flow. And how many agencies can honestly say they have that?

The Freelancer Alternative (And Why It’s Not Actually Cheaper)

“Fine,” you’re thinking. “I’ll just work with freelancers. They’re cheaper and I only pay for what I need.”

We tried this for three years. Here’s what we learned the hard way.

The Quality Lottery

For every great freelance developer, there are ten mediocre ones and three who will ghost you mid-project. The problem isn’t finding freelancers—it’s finding good freelancers who:

• Communicate clearly and proactively
• Understand your clients’ business goals (not just technical requirements)
• Deliver clean, maintainable code
• Actually show up when they say they will
• Don’t disappear when you need revisions

We calculated that we spent roughly 15-20 hours per month just managing freelancers: finding them, vetting them, onboarding them to our processes, and dealing with inevitable issues.

That’s half a full-time employee just managing contractors.

The Margin Problem

Let’s say you find a solid WordPress developer on Upwork for $50/hour. You’re billing your client $125/hour for development work. Great margin, right?

Except:

1. You spend 5 hours vetting and onboarding them
2. The first project takes 20% longer than estimated because they’re learning your workflow
3. You spend 3 hours reviewing their code and requesting changes
4. The client wants revisions, and the freelancer has moved on to another project
5. You now need to find someone else to make the changes, brief them on the project, and manage that handoff

By the time you account for all the overhead, your effective margin is closer to 30-40%, not the 60% you thought you were getting.

And that’s assuming nothing goes wrong.

The Opportunity Cost Nobody Talks About

Here’s the part that kept me up at night: every hour I spent managing developers was an hour I wasn’t spending on:

• Business development
• Client relationships
• Strategic planning
• Actually growing the agency

We tracked this for six months and realized our founders were spending 20-25 hours per week on project management and developer oversight. That’s $50,000-$75,000 in opportunity cost if you value founder time at $100-$150/hour (which you should).

The agencies that scale aren’t the ones with the best developers. They’re the ones whose founders spend their time on growth, not babysitting projects.

What About Remote Developers in Lower-Cost Markets?

This is the approach a lot of agencies try next. Hire developers in Eastern Europe, Latin America, or Southeast Asia where talent is excellent and rates are 40-60% lower than US markets.

It can work. But here’s what makes it work versus what makes it a disaster:

What Makes It Work:

• You hire full-time (not freelance), so they’re committed to your agency
• You invest heavily in onboarding and create detailed processes
• You have overlapping work hours for real-time communication
• You build relationships, not just transactions
• You’re prepared for 3-6 months before they’re truly productive in your workflow

What Makes It a Disaster:

• You treat them like interchangeable contractors
• You don’t invest in communication and process documentation
• You expect them to figure out your client’s brand and business goals from a brief Slack message
• You’re not prepared for time zone challenges and cultural differences

The agencies we know who’ve built successful remote teams offshore spent 6-12 months and significant founder time making it work. It’s not a quick fix.

The Real Question You Should Be Asking

All of this brings us to the actual question, which isn’t “Should I hire a developer?” but rather:

“What does my agency actually need to scale WordPress delivery?”

Because here’s what we’ve learned after working with 50+ agencies:

Most agencies don’t need a developer. They need:

1. Consistent quality they can stake their reputation on
2. Predictable capacity that scales with their pipeline
3. Speed that lets them win deals competitors can’t match
4. Flexibility to ramp up and down based on demand
5. Freedom for founders to focus on growth, not project management

Once you frame the problem that way, the solution looks completely different.

Running the Numbers: What Actually Makes Sense?

Let’s compare three scenarios for a 6-person agency with inconsistent WordPress project flow:

Scenario A: Full-Time Developer

Annual Cost: $120,000
Utilization Rate: 65%
Effective Billable Hours: 1,352 hours
Cost Per Billable Hour: $88.76
Management Overhead: 15-20 hours/month
Flexibility: Zero (you’re paying whether you have work or not)

Scenario B: Freelancer Network

Annual Cost: $60,000-$80,000 (estimated)
Effective Hourly Rate: $50-$75/hour
Management Overhead: 20-25 hours/month
Quality Consistency: High variance
Flexibility: High, but comes with coordination overhead

Scenario C: Dedicated Delivery Partner

Annual Cost: $36,000-$60,000 (based on subscription model)
Effective Capacity: Unlimited requests, 1-2 active projects
Management Overhead: 2-5 hours/month
Quality Consistency: High (dedicated team learns your standards)
Flexibility: Pause/resume monthly

The math changes completely when you consider opportunity cost, management overhead, and consistency.

What We Did (And What Happened)

After running our own agency for four years, we made a decision that felt risky at the time: we got rid of our in-house WordPress developers and found a dedicated delivery partner.

The results over 12 months:

• Revenue increased 2.3x because founders spent time selling, not managing
• Project margins improved from 38% to 52% due to reduced overhead
• Client satisfaction scores went up because delivery was more consistent
• We could take on projects we previously would have declined due to capacity constraints
• Founder stress levels dropped dramatically (this might be the most important metric)

I’m not saying this is the right solution for every agency. If you have consistent year-round project flow and can keep developers at 80%+ utilization, hiring makes sense.

But if you’re like most agencies—with variable project flow, limited management capacity, and ambitious growth goals—there’s probably a better way.

The Bottom Line

The real cost of hiring WordPress developers isn’t the salary. It’s:

• The opportunity cost of founder time spent managing instead of growing
• The productivity loss from variable utilization rates
• The risk of bad hires or unreliable freelancers
• The cash flow impact of fixed overhead during slow months
• The strategic limitations of capacity constraints

Before you post that job listing or vet another Upwork profile, step back and ask yourself: “What does my agency actually need to scale WordPress delivery?”

The answer might surprise you.

---

About the Author: This post was written based on real experiences running and scaling digital agencies. We learned these lessons the expensive way so you don’t have to.